Programmed
instruction is the name of the technology invented by the
behaviorist B.F.
Skinner to improve teaching. It is based on his theory of verbal behavior as a
means to accelerate and increase conventional educational learning.
Programmed instruction
It typically consists of self-teaching with the aid of a specialized
textbook or teaching
machine that presents material structured in a logical and
empirically developed sequence or sequences. Programmed instruction may be
presented by a teacher as well, and it has been argued that the principles of
programmed instruction can improve classic lectures and textbooks. Programmed
instruction allows students to progress through a unit of study at their own
rate, checking their own answers and advancing only after answering correctly.
In one simplified form of PI, after each step, they are presented with a
question to test their comprehension, then are immediately shown the correct
answer or given additional information. However the objective of the
instructional programming is to present the material in very small increments. The more
sophisticated forms of programmed instruction may have the questions or tasks
programmed well enough that the presentation and test model—an extrapolation
from traditional and classical instruction—is not necessarily utilized.
What is microteaching?
Microteaching is an excellent way to build up skills and confidence, to
experience a range of lecturing/tutoring styles and to learn and practice
giving constructive feedback. Microteaching gives instructors an opportunity to
safely put themselves “under the microscope” of a small group audience, but
also to observe and comment on other people's performances. As a tool for
teacher preparation, microteaching trains teaching behaviors and skills in
small group settings aided by video-recordings. In a protected environment of
friends and colleagues, teachers can try out a short piece of what they usually
do with their students, and receive a well-intended collegial feedback. A
microteaching session is a chance to adopt new teaching and learning strategies
and, through assuming the student role, to get an insight into students' needs
and expectations. It is a good time to learn from others and enrich one's own
repertoire of teaching methods.
A microteaching session is much more comfortable than real classroom situations, because it eliminates pressure resulting from the length of the lecture, the scope and content of the matter to be conveyed, and the need to face large numbers of students, some of whom may be inattentive or even hostile. Another advantage of microteaching is that it provides skilled supervisors who can give support, lead the session in a proper direction and share some insights from the pedagogic sciences.
A microteaching session is much more comfortable than real classroom situations, because it eliminates pressure resulting from the length of the lecture, the scope and content of the matter to be conveyed, and the need to face large numbers of students, some of whom may be inattentive or even hostile. Another advantage of microteaching is that it provides skilled supervisors who can give support, lead the session in a proper direction and share some insights from the pedagogic sciences.
Why microteaching?
Medical teachers most often do not receive a special training in
pedagogic techniques, as it is usually not considered necessary for their
recruitment or for an efficient continued performance. Their ability to teach
therefore largely depends on self training, either by trial and error while
teaching or by observation of colleagues, who may or may not be helpful
examples.
Getting in front of students is a trying experience for a budding teacher. One may earnestly try to prepare him or herself: read books about teaching methods, attend lectures and take courses on didactics. Yet, in theory everything seems much simpler than in practice. The complexity of a teaching situation can be overwhelming. To deal effectively with it, teachers must not only have a good knowledge of the subject in hand, but also some communication skills such as ability to observe, supervise, lead a discussion and pose questions. Furthermore, a teacher should be aware of how students perceive him or her. This perception is sometimes quite different from the teacher's self-image. It is difficult to self assess one’s own abilities and we benefit from colleagues’ feed back to recognize our strength and identify areas for possible improvement.
Evaluation of teaching by students is becoming a common practice, and a constructive feedback could be an effective way to improve one's rating as a teacher. Even the experienced educators may sometimes reflect about strengths and weaknesses of their teaching style.
Getting in front of students is a trying experience for a budding teacher. One may earnestly try to prepare him or herself: read books about teaching methods, attend lectures and take courses on didactics. Yet, in theory everything seems much simpler than in practice. The complexity of a teaching situation can be overwhelming. To deal effectively with it, teachers must not only have a good knowledge of the subject in hand, but also some communication skills such as ability to observe, supervise, lead a discussion and pose questions. Furthermore, a teacher should be aware of how students perceive him or her. This perception is sometimes quite different from the teacher's self-image. It is difficult to self assess one’s own abilities and we benefit from colleagues’ feed back to recognize our strength and identify areas for possible improvement.
Evaluation of teaching by students is becoming a common practice, and a constructive feedback could be an effective way to improve one's rating as a teacher. Even the experienced educators may sometimes reflect about strengths and weaknesses of their teaching style.
Historic context
The history of microteaching goes back to the early and mid 1960's, when
Dwight Allen and his colleagues from the Stanford University
developed a training program aimed to improve verbal and nonverbal aspects of
teacher's speech and general performance. The Stanford model consisted of a
three-step (teach, review and reflect, re-teach) approach using actual students
as an authentic audience. The model was first applied to teaching science, but
later it was introduced to language teaching. A very similar model called
Instructional Skills Workshop (ISW) was developed in Canada during the early 1970's as a
training support program for college and institute faculty. Both models were
designed to enhance teaching and promote open collegial discussion about
teaching performance.
In the last few years, microteaching as a professional development tool
is increasingly spreading in the field of medical education.
2. Planning a Microteaching Session
The duration of a Microteaching session depends on the number of
participants. Microteaching should take place in two separate classrooms where
the second room is required for videotape viewing. It is helpful to organize
professional videotaping, although this can also be done (taken over) by the
participants upon instruction.
Equipment for Microteaching session:
·
TV/Computer
set
·
video
recorder/camcorder
·
camera
·
tapes
for camera
·
black-
or whiteboard, flipchart, pin board, markers with different colors
One-day plan for Microteaching (an example):
·
09:00-09:30
Introduction to microteaching given by a professional supervisor
·
09:30-10:00
Preparation of the micro lessons
·
10:00-...
Microteaching session (each segment about 20-30 min)
3. Steps in Microteaching and Rotating Peer Supervision
I. Preparation
Each participant of the session prepares a teaching segment. The
presenter gives a brief statement of the general objectives of his/her presentation
to be addressed. The group may be asked to focus their attention to particular
elements of the lesson or of the teaching style. This may include pace, clarity
of explanation, use of media, voice and body language, level of group
interaction.
II. Presentation and Observation
Each participant presents his/her 10-minute teaching segment. He/she is
allowed to use the media available. During the presentation, other participants
serve as members of a supervisory team and take notes for the group feedback.
Special assessment forms (Tables 1 and 2) may be helpful in standardizing the
observation and feedback process. Each lesson is videotaped. Although the
lesson is short, objective and procedures should be clear to generate useful
discussions.
III. Videotape Viewing
The presenter watches the tape of his/her presentation and decides
whether or not the objectives were accomplished. He/she also makes a list of
strengths and suggestions for personal improvement. Then he/she again joins the
supervisory team. In the meantime the supervisory team discussed and made
conclusions about the teacher’s lecturing.
IV. Discussion and Analysis
While the presenter goes to another room to view the videotape, the
supervisory team discusses and analyses the presentation. Patterns of teaching
with evidence to support them are presented. The discussion should focus on the
identification of recurrent behaviors of the presenter in the act of teaching.
A few patterns are chosen for further discussions with the presenter. Only those
patterns are selected which seem possible to alter and those which through
emphasis or omission would greatly improve the teacher’s presentation.
Objectives of the lesson plan are also examined to determine if they were met.
It is understood that flexible teaching sometimes includes the modification and
omission of objectives. Suggestions for improvement and alternative methods for
presenting the lesson are formulated. Finally, a member of the supervisory team
volunteers to be the speaker in giving the collected group feedback.
V. Giving and receiving feedback
Under the guidance of the professional supervisor, the presenter is
first asked to present a self feed back of his mini lesson. With this new
information taken into account, the supervisory team member who volunteered to
be the speaker summarizes the comments generated during the analysis session.
This part of the session is intended to provide positive reinforcement and
constructive criticism. The presenter is encouraged to interact freely with the
team so that all comments are clarified to his/her satisfaction.
The way in which feedback is given and received contributes to the
learning process. Feedback should be honest and direct, constructive, focusing
on the ways the presenter can improve, and containing personal observations.
The following is a series of suggestions on how to give and receive feedback in a microteaching workshop.
The following is a series of suggestions on how to give and receive feedback in a microteaching workshop.
3.1. Giving feedback
When you are giving feedback, try to:
·
Be specific rather than general. For example: rather
than saying “You weren’t clear in your explanations”, tell the presenter where
he/she was vague, and describe why you had trouble understanding him/her.
Similarly, instead of saying: “I thought you did an excellent job!”, list the
specific things that he/she did well.
·
Be descriptive and specific, rather than evaluative. For
example: you would avoid starting the sentences with “you”, it is better to
start with “I”, so you can say: “I understood the model, after you showed us
the diagram”.
·
Describe something the person can act upon. Making a
comment on the vocal quality of someone whose voice is naturally high-pitched
is only likely to discourage him/her. However, if the person’s voice had a
squeaky quality because he/she was nervous, you might say: “You might want to
breath more deeply, to relax yourself, and that will help to lower the pitch of
your voice as well”.
·
Choose one or two things the person can concentrate on. If the
people are overwhelmed with too many suggestions, they are likely to become
frustrated. When giving feedback, call attention to those areas that need the
most improvement.
·
Avoid conclusions about motives or feelings. For
example: rather than saying: “You don’t seem very enthusiastic about the
lesson”, you can say “Varying your rate and volume of speaking would give you a
more animated style”.
·
Begin and end with strengths of the presentation. If you start off with
negative criticism, the person receiving the feedback might not even hear the
positive part, which will come later.
3.2. Receiving feedback
When you are receiving feedback, try:
·
Not
to respond to each point, rather listen quietly, hearing what other’s experiences were during their review, asking only
for clarification. The only time to interfere with what is being said is if you
need to state that you are overloaded with too much feedback.
·
Be
open to what you are hearing. Being told
that you need to improve yourself is not always easy, but as we have pointed
out, it is an important part of the learning process. Although, you might feel
hurt in response to criticism, try not to let those feelings dissuade you from
using the feedback to your best advantage.
·
Take
notes, if possible. If you can, take notes as you are hearing the
other people’s comment. Than you will have a record to refer to, and you might
discover that the comments that seemed to be the harshest were actually the
most useful.
·
Ask
for specific examples if you need to. If the
critique you are receiving is vague or unfocused, ask the person to give you
several specific examples of the point he/she is trying to make
Judge the
feedback by the person, who is giving it. You
do not have to agree with every comment. Ask other people if they agree with
the person’s critique.
A TRAINING
SIMULATION is a virtual medium through which various types of
skills can be acquired.[1] Training simulations can be used in a
wide variety of genres; however they are most commonly used in
corporate situations to improve business awareness and management skills. They
are also common in academic environments as an integrated part of a business or
management course.
The word
simulation implies an imitation of a real-life process, usually via a computer
or other technological device, in order to provide a lifelike experience. This
has proven to be a very reliable and successful method of training in thousands
of industries worldwide. They can be
used both to allow specialization in a certain area, and to educate individuals
in the workings of the sectors as a whole, making training simulations
incredibly versatile. It is important to emphasize that training simulations
are not just games;[4] their aim is to educate and inform in an
exciting and memorable way, rather than purely to entertain.
PURPOSE
Companies
across the world regularly use simulations as a tool to teach employees.[5]
With the enormous range of simulation-based activities available across the
world, it is unsurprising that the specific aims of the sessions vary very
widely. Some simulations are focused on making decisions in a particular area
of the business, such as personnel or product design, and these are called Functional
Simulations. Others give a general overview of a company and give
experience of making executive management decisions, and are called Total
Enterprise Simulations. In recent
years, however, this classification has become somewhat impractical, as
increasing numbers of training simulations are involving both elements, and
combining both an overall view of the industry with some decisions relating to
specific sectors. Training Simulations normally form part of a programme
designed to educate employees or students about the skills needed to operate a
business, as well as persuade them to think outside the box and see the bigger
picture. This can
make for a better organized, more fluid system in which all employees
understand their part in making the company successful.
0 Comments
To contact Study for Super-Vision, write your comments. Avoid spamming as your post will not be seen by any one.